Remo
DrumTalk » Drum Talk

Re:Head comparison chart! (remo / evans)
go to previous topicgo to next topic

post new topic reply to topic Print this post Print post Forward this post Forward post Click to watch this topic Watch This Topic flat mode Flat threaded mode Threaded
Poster Head comparison chart! (remo / evans)
drummer12





Posts: 305
Joined: Apr 10, 2005
Location: Sasebo-shi Nagasaki, Japan
No. 1 Posted on May 6, 2012 7:30 PM Profile | PM | Email | Quote | Search | Copy | Favorite
I saw this on a different drum forum and during my "studies" I stumbled upon the original by coincidence, so I figured I'd share!

http://www.adcdrums.com/eb/public/remo-evans.comparison.pdf

Due to my failed attempt to copy and paste in the iPhone I just left the link. I'm not sure how up to date the list is and there is bound to be a mistake or two but this will be a good chart for the curious Smile enjoy!



Wishing "rock band" drummers would attempt real drumming to embarrass themselves.
drummer12





Posts: 305
Joined: Apr 10, 2005
Location: Sasebo-shi Nagasaki, Japan
No. 2 Posted on May 6, 2012 7:36 PM Profile | PM | Email | Quote | Search | Copy | Favorite
I've actually got a question concerning what the chart says myself. I noticed that it states that the Evans j1 is a 10mil but 7.5 effective, and I assumed this was due to the etching process thinning the material. But with regards to remo's texturing equivalent, the suede heads, would it mean that a suede ambassador would actually be 7.5 and a suede diplomat 5? I have also noticed the error that they compared the j1 simply to the diplomat and said. Itching about remo's texturing equivalent.


Wishing "rock band" drummers would attempt real drumming to embarrass themselves.

post new topic reply to topic Print this post Print post Forward this post Forward post Click to watch this topic Watch This Topic flat mode Flat threaded mode Threaded
  go to previous topicgo to next topic
Normal post
New post
Deleted Post
Privacy & Legal | Support | Catalogs  © 2012 Remo Inc.
   
 
Page was generated in 17 milliseconds